Increasing The Spatial Resolution Of 3t Carotid Mri Has No Beneficial Effect For Plaque Component Measurement Reproducibility

PurposeDifferent in-plane resolutions have been used for carotid 3T MRI. We compared the reproducibility, as well as the within-and between reader variability of high and routinely used spatial resolution in scans of patients with atherosclerotic carotid artery disease. Since no consensus exists about the optimal segmentation method, we analysed all imaging data using two different segmentation methods.Materials and MethodsIn 31 patient with carotid atherosclerosis a high (0.25 x 0.25 mm(2); HR) and routinely used (0.50 x 0.50 mm(2); LR) spatial resolution carotid MRI scan were performed within one month. A fully blinded closed and a simultaneously open segmentation were used to quantify the lipid rich necrotic core (LRNC), calcified and loose matrix (LM) plaque area and the fibrous cap (FC) thickness.ResultsNo significant differences were observed between scan-rescan reproducibility for HR versus LR measurements, nor did we find any significant difference between the within-reader and between-reader reproducibility. The same applies for differences between the open and closed reads. All intraclass correlation coefficients between scans and rescans for the LRNC, calcified and LM plaque area, as well as the FC thickness measurements with the open segmentation method were excellent (all above 0.75).ConclusionsIncreasing the spatial resolution at the expense of the contrast-to-noise ratio does not improve carotid plaque component scan-rescan reproducibility in patients with atherosclerotic carotid disease, nor does using a different segmentation method.