Normative annual changes in left ventricular volumes, mass and function among healthy adults: a prospective cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study

Background Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is routinely performed to monitor progression and response to interventions in congenital and acquired heart diseases. Cross-sectional CMR studies report normalized reference ranges for cardiac parameters according to age decile together with assessments of short-term inter-study variability; however, most clinical imaging is repeated at much greater intervals of time. There are no prospective CMR data defining long-term changes in cardiac structure and function among healthy subjects. Without such data, it is difficult to determine whether serial changes in cardiac parameters observed in patients reflect disease progression or are merely the consequence of normal ageing. We examined the “within patient” changes in left ventricular (LV) volumes, mass and function over 12 months in a well-characterized cohort of healthy adults. Methods We identified 21 healthy controls (age 39 ± 13 yr, male 71%) who did not proceed to uni-nephrectomy after recruitment into an observational study assessing the cardiovascular effects of live kidney donation (NCT01028703). All subjects were asymptomatic and had a 10-year risk of a cardiovascular event of <20% (QRISK-2), a normal stress echocardiogram and normal haematology and biochemistry profiles. Exclusion criteria included: any history of cardiovascular disease, including hypertension; diabetes; glucose intolerance; chronic kidney disease; first degree relative with a proven or potentially inheritable cardiac condition. Subjects underwent CMR imaging (1.5T Magnetom Avanto, Siemens) at baseline and 12 months. Analysis of SSFP images was performed offline (Argus Software, Siemens) by a single blinded observer (W.E.M.) for assessment of LV volumes, systolic function and mass. Baseline studies were repeat analyzed by the same trained observer to assess intra-observer variability. A subset of participants underwent repeat imaging within 1 hour to determine inter-study variability. Results