Mask registration and wafer overlay

Chulseung Lee, Changjin Bang,Myoungsoo Kim,Hyosang Kang,Dohwa Lee, Woonjae Jeong, Oksung Lim, Seunghoon Yoon, Jaekang Jung, Frank Laske, Lidia Parisoli,Klausdieter Roeth,John C Robinson,Sven Jug, Pavel Izikson, Berta Dinu,Amir Widmann,Dongsub Choi

Proceedings of SPIE(2010)

引用 4|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
Overlay continues to be one of the key challenges for lithography in advanced semiconductor manufacturing. It becomes even more challenging due to the continued shrinking of the device node. Some low k1 techniques, such as Double Exposure and Double Patterning also add additional loss of the overlay margin due to the fact that the single layer pattern is created based on more than 1 exposure. Therefore, the overlay between 2 exposures requires very tight overlay specification. Mask registration is one of the major contributors to wafer overlay, especially field related overlay. We investigated mask registration and wafer overlay by co-analyzing the mask data and the wafer overlay data. To achieve the accurate cohesive results, we introduced the combined metrology mark which can be used for both mask registration measurement as well as for wafer overlay measurement. Coincidence of both metrology marks make it possible to subtract mask signature from wafer overlay without compromising the accuracy due to the physical distance between measurement marks, if we use 2 different marks for both metrologies. Therefore, it is possible to extract pure scanner related signatures, and to analyze the scanner related signatures in details to in order to enable root cause analysis and ultimately drive higher wafer yield. We determined the exact mask registration error in order to decompose wafer overlay into mask, scanner, process and metrology. We also studied the impact of pellicle mounting by comparison of mask registration measurement pre-pellicle mounting and post-pellicle mounting in this investigation.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Overlay,Mask,Registration
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要