OP0094 Cost-Effectiveness of Biologic Versus Conventional Combination Treatment in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2-Year Results of the Randomised Controlled Swefot Trial

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases(2014)

引用 0|浏览12
暂无评分
摘要
Background Adding infliximab (IFX) or sulfasalazine+hydroxychloroquine (SSZ+HCQ) to methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active, early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), resulted in superior radiographic outcome in the IFX group,[1] while disease-activity, utility and work loss improved in both arms, without detectable between-group differences at 21 months[1-3]. Objectives To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biologic vs. conventional combination treatment in early RA-patients responding insufficiently to MTX. Methods This multicenter, randomised, controlled, open-label trial enrolled RA-patients (symptoms 3.2 were randomised to addition of IFX or SSZ+HCQ. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER=€/quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) was assessed during 21 months from randomisation. Costs of RA-related medications, non-primary healthcare utilisation and work loss were retrieved from nationwide registers, while EuroQol 5-Dimensions utility was collected quarterly. Undiscounted analyses including all patients were performed from the societal (human capital method) and healthcare perspectives. Confidence intervals were estimated by non-parametric bootstrapping. Results Of 487 patients initially enrolled, 128 and 130 were randomised to biologic and conventional treatment, respectively. The biologic group had higher drug and healthcare costs (€27,487 vs. 10,364; adjusted mean difference 16,956 [95%CI 14,647;19,162]), while no difference was seen in productivity losses (€33,804 vs. 29,220; 3,961 [-3,986;11,850]), resulting in higher societal cost, as compared to the conventional treatment arm (€61,291 vs. 39,584; 20,916 [12,800;28,660]). Mean accumulated QALYs were 1.10 in the biologic and 1.12 in the conventional treatment group (adjusted mean difference 0.01 [95%CI -0.07;0.08]). The resulting ICER, comparing the biologic to the conventional treatment option, was €2,404,197/QALY from the societal ( Figure ), and €1,948,919/QALY from the healthcare perspective. Image/graph Conclusions In early MTX-refractory RA, the addition of IFX, as compared to addition of SSZ+HCQ, was not cost-effective over 21 months at willingness to pay levels generally considered acceptable. References van Vollenhoven RF, et al. Lancet 2012;379:1712-1720. Karlsson JA, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2012. Nov 29 [Epub ahead of print]. Eriksson JK, et al. ACR 2011; Abstract no: 459. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
更多
查看译文
关键词
early rheumatoid arthritis,rheumatoid arthritis,randomised controlled swefot trial,cost-effectiveness cost-effectiveness
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要