Student’s perspective on improvements for second year and other undergraduate engineering design courses

Students and educators should work together on pushing the boundaries of expectation - "expect more to get more" - so that design courses can become increasingly effective and greater potential can be achieved. I encourage instructors and educators to consider the fact that this generation of engineering students enter university with a multitude of experiences and skills in design, decision making and communication that past generations did not have – and taking advantage of that advanced starting point will greatly improve the caliber of the course offerings. As an engineering undergraduate student at Queen’s University, I have been exposed to several engineering design courses. Starting in the 2011-2012 academic year when I was in my second year, a course referred to as APSC 200/293 was introduced. I will be critically discussing my experiences both positive and negative with this design course, as well as the first year design course, and in my opinion how they can be improved. Information and feedback regarding the design courses was obtained from the faculty and compared to my observations. Starting the design courses early on in the students’ careers gives them an excellent introduction to the real world of engineering. However, there is great room for improvement in courses of this sort, which can be assisted by utilizing the opinions of willing students. I will further discuss these courses, their downfalls and advantages, and where improvements could be made to promote the success of students.