Impact of Bowel Preparation with Low-Volume (2-Liter) and Intermediate-Volume (3-Liter) Polyethylene Glycol on Colonoscopy Quality: A Prospective Observational Study

DIGESTION(2015)

引用 9|浏览9
暂无评分
摘要
Background/Aims: Two-liter polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the most commonly used bowel-cleansing regimen in Taiwan, but its efficacy is unsatisfactory.The aim of this study was to compare 2-liter and 3-liter PEG in terms of their impact on colonoscopy quality among an average-risk population. Methods:Two-liter PEG was provided between August 2012 and May 2013, while 3-liter PEG was provided between June 2013 and March 2014. A split-dose regimen was provided for morning colonoscopy and a same-day regimen was provided for afternoon colonoscopy. The level of bowel cleansing was prospectively scored. Results: A total of 407 consecutive subjects completed the 2-liter regimen, and another 407 consecutive subjects completed the 3-liter regimen. The 3-liter group had a significantly higher rate of excellent or good preparations, equivalent to a Boston bowel preparation scale of >= 7 than the 2-liter group (90 vs. 73%, p <0.0001). More subjects in the 3-liter preparation group compared with the 2-liter group had overall adenoma (70 vs. 54%, p < 0.0001), proximal adenoma (47 vs. 35%, p = 0.0006), sessile serrated adenoma (28 vs. 6%, p <0.0001), and advanced adenoma (21 vs. 9%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Three-liter PEG provided better cleansing quality and higher adenoma detection rate than 2-liter PEG. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
更多
查看译文
关键词
Adenoma detection rate,Boston bowel preparation scale,Bowel cleansing,Bowel preparation,Colonoscopy,Polyethylene glycol,Sessile serrated adenoma
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要