Efficacy of two noninvasive weaning strategies in intubated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison.

Heart & Lung(2016)

引用 5|浏览18
暂无评分
摘要
The purpose of our indirect comparison was to explore the optimal switching time to noninvasive ventilation for further weaning in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials comparing noninvasive weaning at spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) failure after meeting simple weaning criteria or at the pulmonary infection control window (PIC window) with conventional invasive weaning in COPD patients. Using conventional invasive weaning as a bridge, we indirectly compared the two noninvasive weaning strategies using the Bucher approach. Noninvasive weaning at SBT failure after meeting simple weaning criteria was associated with an extended duration of endotracheal mechanical ventilation (standardized mean difference 1.90, 95% CI 1.27–2.53, P < 0.001) compared with noninvasive weaning at the PIC window. No significant differences in mortality or the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia were observed. Our study suggests that the PIC window may be a promising switching time for noninvasive weaning in COPD patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,Noninvasive ventilation,Weaning,Meta-analysis,Indirect treatment comparison
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要