Erratum: "Examination of the Safety of Pediatric Vaccine Schedules in a Non-Human Primate Model: Assessments of Neurodevelopment, Learning, and Social Behavior".

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES(2016)

引用 0|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
Vol. 124, No. 1 ErratumOpen AccessErratum: “Examination of the Safety of Pediatric Vaccine Schedules in a Non-Human Primate Model: Assessments of Neurodevelopment, Learning, and Social Behavior”is correction ofExamination of the Safety of Pediatric Vaccine Schedules in a Non-Human Primate Model: Assessments of Neurodevelopment, Learning, and Social Behavior Britni Curtis, Noelle Liberato, Megan Rulien, Kelly Morrisroe, Caroline Kenney, Vernon Yutuc, Clayton Ferrier, C. Nathan Marti, Dorothy Mandell, Thomas M. Burbacher, Gene P. Sackett, and Laura Hewitson Britni Curtis Search for more papers by this author , Noelle Liberato Search for more papers by this author , Megan Rulien Search for more papers by this author , Kelly Morrisroe Search for more papers by this author , Caroline Kenney Search for more papers by this author , Vernon Yutuc Search for more papers by this author , Clayton Ferrier Search for more papers by this author , C. Nathan Marti Search for more papers by this author , Dorothy Mandell Search for more papers by this author , Thomas M. Burbacher Search for more papers by this author , Gene P. Sackett Search for more papers by this author , and Laura Hewitson Search for more papers by this author Published:1 January 2016https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.124-A11AboutSectionsPDF ToolsDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InReddit Environ Health Perspect 123:579–589 (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408257Table 1 of this article incorrectly inverted the numbers of animals in the control group and in the 1990s Primate group, listing them as 12 and 16, respectively. The correct number of animals in the control group was 16, and the correct number of animals in the 1990s Primate group was 12. The corrected Table 1 appears in this erratum.In Table S1, the total number of animals in the control group should have been listed as 16, not 20; the total number of animals in the 2011 N study group should have been listed as 24, not 20. The corrected Table S1 appears in this erratum.These errors do not affect the analysis, study findings, or interpretation of the results. The authors regret these typographical errors.Table 1 Study groups, sample sizes (n), and schedules for vaccine administration.GroupnBirth2 weeks4 weeks6 weeks15 weeks52 weeksControl16SalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineMMR15SalineSalineSalineSalineMMRMMRSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineSalineTCV12Hep BHep BHep BHep BSalineSalineDTaPDTaPDTaPDTaPDTaPHibHibHibHib1990s Primate12Hep BHep BHep BHep BMMRMMRDTaPDTaPDTaPDTaPDTaPHibHibHibHib1990s Pediatrica12Hep BHep BHep BHep BMMRNoneDTaPDTaPDTaPDTaPHibHibHibHib200812See Supplemental Material, Table S3, for detailsAbbreviations: Hep B, hepatitis B vaccine; DTaP, diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis vaccine; Hib, Haemophilus ­influenza B vaccine; MMR, measles, mumps, rubella vaccine; TCV, thimerosal-containing vaccines. aFor the 1990s Pediatric group, vaccines were administered at birth, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months and 15 months; the MMR and DTaP boosters were not administered at 52 months because animals were sacrificed at approximately 18 months. Table S1 Assignment of animals to each study group across the 5 breeding seasons.Study Groupa2008 N2009 N2010 N2011 N2012 NTotal NControl4408016MMR3048015TCV04440121990s Primate04800121990s Pediatric0000121220080444012Total71620241279aAnimals in each study group were derived from pregnancies from multiple breeding seasons. For example, animals in the control group were included in years 2008, 2009 and 2011, whereas animals in the TCV group were included in 2009, 2010 and 2011. The only exception to this was made for animals in the 1990s Pediatric group. This group was added to the study protocol in 2011 as a protocol modification, so all pregnancies for this group were derived in the last year of the study (2012).FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsRelated articlesExamination of the Safety of Pediatric Vaccine Schedules in a Non-Human Primate Model: Assessments of Neurodevelopment, Learning, and Social Behavior18 February 2015Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 124, No. 1 January 2016Metrics About Article Metrics Publication History Originally published1 January 2016Published in print1 January 2016 Financial disclosuresPDF download License information EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted. Note to readers with disabilities EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [email protected]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.
更多
查看译文
关键词
pediatric vaccine schedules,neurodevelopment,primate,non-human
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要