Clinical results of intraarterial thrombolysis according to tPA administration and perfusion/diffusion mismatching

Background IA-Tx and advanced dynamic imaging studies have been adopted for ischemic stroke patient treatment. Many patients are treated with IV-tPA, but this treatment is not always feasible. In this study, IA-Tx was used for patients for whom IV-tPA was not indicated or when IV-tPA did not result in recanalization. Methods A total of 156 patients treated with IA-Tx were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 72 patients were treated with a full dose of IV-tPA before receiving the IA-Tx; the remaining 84 patients only received IA-Tx. An initial imaging study using CTA and acute stroke MRI followed. Patients’ demographics and clinical results were recorded and compared according to P/D mismatching and IV-tPA. Results Among P/D-mismatched patients, the recanalization rate was 80 % and the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate was 14.5 %, while among P/D-matched patients, the rates were 63 % and 41.3 % respectively (p < 0.05). A favorable clinical outcome occurred in 49.1 % of P/D-mismatched, but only in 21.7 % of P/D-matched patients (p < 0.05). Among patients who were treated with IV-tPA before undergoing IA-Tx, the recanalization rate was 79.2 % and the sICH rate was 27.8 %, while it was 71.4 % and 17.9 % in patients who did not receive IV-tPA (p < 0.05). Conclusions Patients who have P/D mismatching and are treated with IA-Tx have higher recanalization rates and a greater probability of a favorable outcome than patients who have P/D matching and receive IA-Tx. For patients who do not undergo successful recanalization after IV-tPA or who are not indicated for IV-tPA, the authors recommend IA-Tx after undergoing appropriate imaging evaluation.