Radiofrequency versus electrocautery for inferior turbinate hypertrophy.

AIM:The aims of this study were to compare radiofrequency tissue reduction (RFTR) and electrocautery (EC) techniques by assessing preoperatively and 8 weeks postoperatively the visual analog scale (VAS), inspiratory peak flowmetry (IPF), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volume measurement of the inferior turbinate and to see whether EC still stands as a valid treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. METHODS:A total of 36 patients were included in the study. An equal number of patients were chosen randomly from 2 groups. Inferior turbinate volumes measured by MRI, IPF, the VAS, and the Sinonasal Outcome Test-20 were used to determine the efficacy of treatment and to compare the 2 groups. RESULTS:Postoperative IPF increase, VAS score decrease, and Sinonasal Outcome Test-20 score decrease were statistically more significant in the EC group, compared with the RFTR group. Although statistically not significant, postoperative inferior turbinate MRI volume decrease was more evident in the EC group when compared with the RFTR group. CONCLUSIONS:Both RFTR and EC techniques could be used as an effective treatment of choice for inferior turbinate hypertrophy, and EC technique is superior to RFTR technique to achieve high efficiency.