Comparison of complications of the suprameatal approach and mastoidectomy with posterior tympanotomy approach in cochlear implantation: a meta-analysis.

Background: Cochlear implantation (CI) is a popular procedure to preserve hearing in patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Evidence shows that the suprameatal approach (SMA) may help reducing the risk of the incidence of complications and shortening the surgery time, but there is still dispute. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of complications of SMA and the mastoidectomy with posterior tympanotomy approach (MPTA), and to find whether SMA yields better outcomes than MPTA. Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science and Chinese Biomedical Literature databases, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-Text database, and Wangfang database. The latest data was accessed in March 2013. Review Manager 5.1 software was used for comprehensive quantification data analysis. Results: Three studies were included in the meta-analysis, composed of 799 participants and reporting major and minor complications. The meta-analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in major and minor complications between the two approaches, except for facial nerve and chorda tympani injuries (OR = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.67; p = 0.02; I-2 = 0%). Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that SMA may be clearly a good alternative to the classical surgery technique for CI in terms of reducing the incidence of facial nerve injury and chorda tympani sacrifice. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel