Conserving large populations of lions - the argument for fences has holes.

S Creel,M S Becker,S M Durant,J M'Soka,W Matandiko, A J Dickman,D Christianson,E Dröge,T Mweetwa,N Pettorelli,E Rosenblatt,P Schuette,R Woodroffe,S Bashir,R C Beudels-Jamar,S Blake,M Borner,C Breitenmoser,F Broekhuis,G Cozzi, T R B Davenport,J Deutsch, L Dollar,S Dolrenry, I Douglas-Hamilton, E Fitzherbert, C Foley, L Hazzah,P Henschel, R Hilborn,J G C Hopcraft, D Ikanda,A Jacobson, B Joubert, D Joubert,M S Kelly,L Lichtenfeld,G M Mace, J Milanzi, N Mitchell, M Msuha, R Muir,J Nyahongo,S Pimm, G Purchase, C Schenck, C Sillero-Zubiri, A R E Sinclair,A N Songorwa, M Stanley-Price, C A Tehou, C Trout, J Wall,G Wittemyer,A Zimmermann

ECOLOGY LETTERS（2013）

引用 102|浏览12

暂无评分

摘要

Packer etal. reported that fenced lion populations attain densities closer to carrying capacity than unfenced populations. However, fenced populations are often maintained above carrying capacity, and most are small. Many more lions are conserved per dollar invested in unfenced ecosystems, which avoid the ecological and economic costs of fencing.

查看译文

关键词

Carnivores,conservation,cost-effectiveness,fence,lions,population density,population size

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要