Two Innovative Pharmaceutical Forms of Leuprorelin: Results from 818 Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer

Patricia Gravel, Dirk Samland, Martin Löffler, Simone Maier,Micol Panozzo,Michael Muenzberg

ADVANCES IN THERAPY(2013)

引用 10|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Objectives This study set out to examine the efficacy and tolerability of two innovative implant forms of leuprorelin acetate in men with advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer in everyday clinical practice. Methods Data were collected from 818 patients (from 273 centers across Germany) who were pretreated with slow-release luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist formulations and who were about to be switched to the leuprorelin implants. Patients received three injections of 1- or 3-month leuprorelin implant and physicians were asked to complete a case report form specific to each of the three clinic visits. Documented parameters included laboratory measurements, such as testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, adverse events, and patient- and physician-rated assessments of the therapy. Results Compared with baseline, a significant decrease in both testosterone and PSA levels were measured after the first and second injections of leuprorelin implant. These results were confirmed for both the 1-month and 3-month implants in separate analyses. Switching, without treatment interruption, from Trenantone® (Takeda Pharma GmBH, Aachen, Germany) to the leuprorelin implant resulted in a significant decrease in the mean serum testosterone concentrations ( P < 0.05) and a nonsignificant increase in the proportion of patients reaching castrate testosterone levels, while the number of patients with PSA values ≤4 ng/mL significantly increased ( P = 0.045). Similar results were obtained for patients previously treated with goserelin who switched to leuprorelin implant. For 94% of patients, treating physicians rated the efficacy of leuprorelin implant as “very good” or “good.” Treatment with leuprorelin implant was well tolerated, with only 61 adverse events reported in 42 (5.1%) patients. Patients and physicians rated the tolerability of leuprorelin implant as “very good” or “good” in 95% and 91% of cases, respectively. Conclusions These results confirm the efficacy, tolerability, and ease of use of the leuprorelin implants among a large population of men with advanced, hormone-dependent prostate cancer treated in a clinical practice setting.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Efficacy,Implant formulation,Leuprorelin acetate,Oncology,Prostate cancer,Prostate-specific antigen,Testosterone,Tolerability
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要