Subjective ratings of the characteristics and sequelae of good and poor sleep in normals.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY(1988)

Cited 63|Views6
No score
Abstract
AbstractForty normal subjects completed a general screening inventory and two postsleep questionnaires (PSQs). One PSQ was self-administered after a good night of sleep and one after a poor night of sleep. Responses to a subset of items from both nights were factor-analyzed. Varimax rotation yielded four factors that were interpreted as (a) Dysphoria (b) Cognitive Inefficiency and Sleepiness (c) Motor Impairment and (d) Social Discomfort. Night-tonight comparisons of subjects' estimates of sleep parameters reveal that poor sleep is associated with longer sleep latency, a greater number of awakenings, less total sleep time, and more difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep than good sleep. Mean scores for each generated factor of the PSQ also differed significantly between nights, suggesting that a greater degree of disturbance is associated with poor sleep. The implications of these data as well as the reliability of subjective ratings of sleep quality and post-sleep experiences are discussed.
More
Translated text
Key words
Sleep Quality,Sleep Duration,Sleep,Psychometric Evaluation,Insomnia
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined