Comparison of serum creatinine and cystatin C for early diagnosis of contrast-induced nephropathy after coronary angiography and interventions.

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY(2012)

Cited 49|Views10
No score
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic accuracy of serum creatinine and cystatin C (Cys) as early predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has been debated. We investigated the diagnostic sensitivities, diagnostic specificities, and variations from baseline for serum creatinine and Cys in CIN. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 166 patients at risk for CIN at baseline, and at 12, 24, and 48 h after exposure to contrast media. CIN occurred in 30 patients (18%). Changes (Delta) compared to baseline in serum creatinine and Cys were evaluated at the pre-defined time points. ROC curve analysis was performed for the Delta 12-h basal serum creatinine and Cys. RESULTS: The Delta serum creatinine at 12 h from baseline was the earliest predictor of CIN [area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.80; P < 0.001]. The Delta serum creatinine 15% variation [0.15 mg/dL (13.2 mu mol/L)] yielded 43% diagnostic sensitivity and 93% diagnostic specificity. The Delta Cys at 12 h from baseline performed significantly worse than serum creatinine (AUC = 0.48; P = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Variations from the serum creatinine baseline offer better diagnostic accuracy for predicting CIN at an earlier stage than similar variations in Cys. An additional diagnostic value of Cys over the determination of serum creatinine in the setting of CIN was not observed. (C) 2011 American Association for Clinical Chemistry
More
Translated text
Key words
predictive value of tests,prospective studies
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined