Diagnosis of chlamydia trachomatis infections in women: urinary PCR compared to cervical culture and PCR on cervical swabs in high risk females.

Laeknabladid(1995)

Cited 23|Views2
No score
Abstract
Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women has traditionally depended on cell culture or enzyme linked immunoassay. Recently Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) has been shown to be more sensitive than these methods when performed on endocervical swabs. A total of 203 high risk females were enrolled in a comparative study of three methods for diagnosing C. trachomatis infections: McCoy cell culture and Amplicor(R) PCR on endocervical swabs and urine. Thirty four had positive cultures, 38 positive PCR from cervix and 37 had positive PCR on urine specimens. When discrepancy occurred, the leftover Amplicor(R) specimen was retested by Roche with Amplicor(R) and a primer for the Major Outer Membrane Protein (MOMP) gene. None was false positive in cell culture or in urinary PCR but two were false positive in cervical PCR. In all three tests, 32 were positive. The sensitivity of culture was 87%, 92% in cervical PCR and 95% in urinary PCR. The specificity was 100% in both culture and urinary PCR but 98% in cervical PCR. The results show that Amplicor(R) PCR performed on female urine is more sensitive and as specific as cell culture.
More
Translated text
Key words
chlamydia trachomatis infections,cervical swabs,urinary pcr,cervical culture
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined