Reply To Garcia Et Al.: Common Mistakes In Measuring Frequency-Dependent Word Characteristics

The concerns expressed by Garcia et al. (1) are misplaced due to a range of misconceptions about word usage frequency, word rank, and expert-constructed word lists such as LIWC (Linguist Inquiry and Word Count) (2). We provide a complete response in our paper's online appendices (3). Garcia et al. (1) suggest that the set of function words in the LIWC dataset (2) show a wide spectrum of average happiness with positive skew (figure 1A in ref. 1) when, according to their interpretation, these words should exhibit a Dirac δ function located at neutral (havg = 5 on a 1–9 scale). However, many words tagged as function words in the LIWC dataset readily elicit an emotional response in raters as exemplified by “greatest” (havg = 7.26), “best” (havg = 7.26), “negative” (havg = 2.42), and “worst” (havg = 2.10). In our study (3), basic function words that are expected to be neutral, such as “the” (havg = 4.98) and “to” (havg = 4.98), were appropriately scored as such. Moreover, no meaningful statement about biases can be made for …