An Approach to Minimizing Artifacts Caused by Cross-Sensitivity in the Determination of Air–Sea $$\text{ CO }_{2}$$ Flux Using the Eddy-Covariance Technique

BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY(2013)

引用 5|浏览10
暂无评分
摘要
The air–sea \(\text{ CO }_{2}\) flux was measured from a research vessel in the North Yellow Sea in October 2007 using an open-path eddy-covariance technique. In 11 out of 64 samples, the normalized spectra of scalars (\(\text{ CO }_{2}\), water vapour, and temperature) showed similarities. However, in the remaining samples, the normalized \(\text{ CO }_{2}\) spectra were observed to be greater than those of water vapour and temperature at low frequencies. In this paper, the noise due to cross-sensitivity was identified through a combination of intercomparisons among the normalized spectra of three scalars and additional analyses. Upon examination, the cross-sensitivity noise appeared to be mainly present at frequencies \({<}0.8\,\text{ Hz }\). Our analysis also suggested that the high-frequency fluctuations of \(\text{ CO }_{2}\) concentration (frequency \({>}0.8\,\text{ Hz }\)) was probably less affected by the cross-sensitivity. To circumvent the cross-sensitivity issue, the cospectrum in the high-frequency range 0.8–1.5 Hz, instead of the whole range, was used to estimate the \(\text{ CO }_{2}\) flux by taking the contribution of the high frequency to the \(\text{ CO }_{2}\) flux to be the same as the contribution to the water vapour flux. The estimated air–sea \(\text{ CO }_{2}\) flux in the North Yellow Sea was \(-0.039\,\pm \,0.048\,\text{ mg } \text{ m }^{-2}\,\text{ s }^{-1},\) a value comparable to the estimates using the inertial dissipation method and Edson’s method (Edson et al., J Geophys Res 116:C00F10, 2011).
更多
查看译文
关键词
Air–sea $$\text{ CO }_{2}$$ flux, Cospectrum, Cross-sensitivity, Eddy covariance, Yellow Sea
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要