Design and modeling of new platelet-activating factor antagonists. 3. Relative importance of hydrophobicity and electronic distribution in piperazinic series.

Extensive analysis of results obtained in earlier publications (Lamouri et al. (1993); Tavet et al. (1996) led us to reexamine our interpretations and conclusions about hydrophobic and electronic distribution effects. In terms of hydrophobicity balance, a bilinear regression has been derived between lipophilicity of the appendix in position-2, ƒ(Z), versus anti-aggregant activity for 45 homogeneous compounds including data from both papers (Parts 1 and 2). These features reinforce the conclusion that the kinetic phase in the experimental medium is probably determinant. Consequently, the role of electronic distribution is preponderant at the level of the receptor. Two specific studies demonstrated that decrease of negative electrostatic potential effects of the largest ‘cache-oreilles’ system lowered the anti-aggregant activity (comparison of compounds 1f, 2, 3 and 4), on one hand and, on the other hand, the combined effect of phenyl groups created negative wells, as observed there with a diphenyl-methyl moiety, instead of an usual trimethoxybenzoyl function (comparison of compounds 8 and 10). It was clearly demonstrated that this moiety does not work by means of a hydrophobic anchorage: comparison of compounds 9, 10 and 11.