THE VINLAND MAP: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF ARCHAEOMETRIC RESEARCH ON ITS AUTHENTICITY*

The authenticity of the 'Vinland Map' (Beinecke Library of Rare Books and Manuscripts at Yale University) has been challenged on both codicological and scientific grounds, the latter resulting from a microscopic study of the ink employed. McCrone Associates of Chicago examined, between 1972 and 1974, a total of 29 microparticles, including 16 of ink from the Vinland Map, and in 1974 reported to Yale that it contained a pigment, anatase, only available after 1920. In 1974, Yale announced that the map was 'probably a modern forgery'. This review critically examines archaeometric research leading to, and testing, this conclusion.