基本信息
views: 15
![](https://originalfileserver.aminer.cn/sys/aminer/icon/show-trajectory.png)
Bio
He has held visiting appointments in criminology at Oxford, Sydney, Griffith and Cambridge, in psychology at New York University and John Jay College of Criminal Justice, in law at Yale, and in public policy at Harvard (Kennedy School).
Working at the intersection of psychology and law, his research focuses on procedural justice (the importance of fair process in interactions between power-holders and subordinates), distributive justice (the allocation of finite resources that determine who gets the benefits and burdens of social control)and legitimacy (perceptions of the right to power) in the context of the criminal justice system. He is interested in clarifying the meaning and measurement of these concepts; understanding the causal mechanisms that transmit the effects of procedural justice, distributive justice and legitimacy on various behavioural and attitudinal outcomes; testing how well procedural justice theory travels across diverse social, political and legal contexts using methodologically equivalent research designs; bringing perceptions of structural racism into procedural justice theory; and examining the importance of ‘bounded authority’, i.e. respecting the limits of one’s rightful authority.
Working at the intersection of psychology and law, his research focuses on procedural justice (the importance of fair process in interactions between power-holders and subordinates), distributive justice (the allocation of finite resources that determine who gets the benefits and burdens of social control)and legitimacy (perceptions of the right to power) in the context of the criminal justice system. He is interested in clarifying the meaning and measurement of these concepts; understanding the causal mechanisms that transmit the effects of procedural justice, distributive justice and legitimacy on various behavioural and attitudinal outcomes; testing how well procedural justice theory travels across diverse social, political and legal contexts using methodologically equivalent research designs; bringing perceptions of structural racism into procedural justice theory; and examining the importance of ‘bounded authority’, i.e. respecting the limits of one’s rightful authority.
Research Interests
Papers共 258 篇Author StatisticsCo-AuthorSimilar Experts
By YearBy Citation主题筛选期刊级别筛选合作者筛选合作机构筛选
时间
引用量
主题
期刊级别
合作者
合作机构
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCYno. 4 (2024): 521-559
CrimRxiv (2024)
ACCESS TO JUSTICE, DIGITALIZATION AND VULNERABILITY: Exploring Trust in Justicepp.65-85, (2024)
Cited0Views0Bibtex
0
0
ACCESS TO JUSTICE, DIGITALIZATION AND VULNERABILITY: Exploring Trust in Justicepp.129-149, (2024)
Cited0Views0Bibtex
0
0
ACCESS TO JUSTICE, DIGITALIZATION AND VULNERABILITY: Exploring Trust in Justicepp.193-203, (2024)
Cited0Views0Bibtex
0
0
ACCESS TO JUSTICE, DIGITALIZATION AND VULNERABILITY: Exploring Trust in Justicepp.204-213, (2024)
Cited0Views0Bibtex
0
0
ACCESS TO JUSTICE, DIGITALIZATION AND VULNERABILITY: Exploring Trust in Justicepp.174-192, (2024)
Cited0Views0Bibtex
0
0
ACCESS TO JUSTICE, DIGITALIZATION AND VULNERABILITY: Exploring Trust in Justicepp.86-105, (2024)
Cited0Views0Bibtex
0
0
ACCESS TO JUSTICE, DIGITALIZATION AND VULNERABILITY: Exploring Trust in Justicepp.21-41, (2024)
Cited0Views0Bibtex
0
0
ACCESS TO JUSTICE, DIGITALIZATION AND VULNERABILITY: Exploring Trust in Justicepp.150-173, (2024)
Cited0Views0Bibtex
0
0
Load More
Author Statistics
#Papers: 250
#Citation: 15881
H-Index: 67
G-Index: 123
Sociability: 6
Diversity: 2
Activity: 19
Co-Author
Co-Institution
D-Core
- 合作者
- 学生
- 导师
Data Disclaimer
The page data are from open Internet sources, cooperative publishers and automatic analysis results through AI technology. We do not make any commitments and guarantees for the validity, accuracy, correctness, reliability, completeness and timeliness of the page data. If you have any questions, please contact us by email: report@aminer.cn