基本信息
浏览量:31
![](https://originalfileserver.aminer.cn/sys/aminer/icon/show-trajectory.png)
个人简介
Current Research
Besides general regulatory and policy work on the crossing between transport and energy, Johannes is mainly concerned with the role of security in mobility transitions. He studies how security choices, arguments, logics and practices are used and misused to speed up or slow down transitions in transport systems and mobility in general.
Based on a broad interpretation of security, one that incorporates a wide range of logics around risk, insurance, safety, cybersecurity, surveillance, etc., and a critical perspective that draws on the security literature around securitization, biosecurity and security practices, the project will engage critically with security decision-making in mobility transitions. The focus is not on security as a binary condition of being safe/unsafe, with unsafe events in need of countermeasures, but on the political processes through which security logics and arguments are generated, used and discarded to speed up and slow down transformations. So instead of defining security, the project studies, among others, how issues become security concerns, what the political effects are of such a move, and what happens when different security logics clash on a particular transport topic. By using security as an entry into recent transportation debates, including recent transitions around EVs, AVs, MAAS and so on, it becomes possible to disclose the hidden assumptions, exclusions and other ethical questions behind risk and safety decision making. In short, this project simultaneously offers a first and thorough critical reflection on what security does in transport and it offers deeper insight into how security returns in transitions.
Besides general regulatory and policy work on the crossing between transport and energy, Johannes is mainly concerned with the role of security in mobility transitions. He studies how security choices, arguments, logics and practices are used and misused to speed up or slow down transitions in transport systems and mobility in general.
Based on a broad interpretation of security, one that incorporates a wide range of logics around risk, insurance, safety, cybersecurity, surveillance, etc., and a critical perspective that draws on the security literature around securitization, biosecurity and security practices, the project will engage critically with security decision-making in mobility transitions. The focus is not on security as a binary condition of being safe/unsafe, with unsafe events in need of countermeasures, but on the political processes through which security logics and arguments are generated, used and discarded to speed up and slow down transformations. So instead of defining security, the project studies, among others, how issues become security concerns, what the political effects are of such a move, and what happens when different security logics clash on a particular transport topic. By using security as an entry into recent transportation debates, including recent transitions around EVs, AVs, MAAS and so on, it becomes possible to disclose the hidden assumptions, exclusions and other ethical questions behind risk and safety decision making. In short, this project simultaneously offers a first and thorough critical reflection on what security does in transport and it offers deeper insight into how security returns in transitions.
研究兴趣
论文共 61 篇作者统计合作学者相似作者
按年份排序按引用量排序主题筛选期刊级别筛选合作者筛选合作机构筛选
时间
引用量
主题
期刊级别
合作者
合作机构
Hiroki Ito,Johannes Kester
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATIONno. 11 (2023): 1171-1182
Research in Transportation Business & Management (2022): 100903
Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews (2020)
加载更多
作者统计
#Papers: 61
#Citation: 2126
H-Index: 23
G-Index: 46
Sociability: 2
Diversity: 2
Activity: 51
合作学者
合作机构
D-Core
- 合作者
- 学生
- 导师
数据免责声明
页面数据均来自互联网公开来源、合作出版商和通过AI技术自动分析结果,我们不对页面数据的有效性、准确性、正确性、可靠性、完整性和及时性做出任何承诺和保证。若有疑问,可以通过电子邮件方式联系我们:report@aminer.cn